Showing posts with label health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health. Show all posts

Friday, February 15, 2013

The winter blues — Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)

Of all places, I found this item on depression caused in large part by the weather in Northern countries, found it in the newsletter of a small political party here in Ontario, Canada.  It is cawzed by reduced light in relation to eating habits and physical activity.  It's called Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD).
I am depressed, but I'm not lonely, but am having severe problems with the health service I need.

— Albert Gedraitis




Family Coalition Party (Feb15,2k13)

Winter: 


an elder's worst nightmare



Friday, February 15, 2013 - 09:14:38 AM 
by Pete Aarssen, CFP, CLU, CH.F.C., EPC
It’s 5:30 p.m. and the sun is already set. Yes, the lights 
go out early in our long, cold Canadian winters. Hunkering 
down in our homes for much of our day can make even the 
sturdiest folks a little stir-crazy but for elders, the long 
winter months bring increased isolation, boredom and 
depression. Some head south for the winter but for those who 
remain, life can start to appear less satisfying. 

There is a scientific connection to the effect of reduced 
light on our moods, eating habits and physical activity: it 
is called Seasonal Affective Disorder, known also by the 
appropriate acronym S.A.D. The likelihood of developing 
S.A.D. increases during winter months. Elder’s face 
increased isolation and loneliness as a normal part of the 
aging process. 

Later in life, they see a narrowing of their social network 
brought on by the deaths or institutionalization of their 
peers and extended family members. With fewer and more 
globe-trotting children, elders also experience the physical 
and sociological distancing of themselves from their 
children. With decreases in physical mobility as they age, 
elders grow more dependent on others but have fewer to which 
to turn. In some cases, their gloom turns to depression. 

Depression is four times more likely to strike people over 
age 65 than any younger age group. It is readily treated but 
few get the help they need. It is difficult for anyone 
supporting an elder- a child, a sibling, or a caregiver- to 
imagine ramping up the attention they already pay to their 
loved ones. However, it is more important than ever to stay 
in touch with elders during the winter season, to increase 
visits or make excuses to call them. (I hope my mother is 
not reading this column!)

It isn’t easy. We all have busy, demanding lives. But if we 
can stop for a minute to consider that more than 90% of 
elders live alone or with one dependant, we will also 
realize that it doesn’t take much to brighten their day. 
Make personal contact by picking up the phone, stopping in 
for tea, popping up on Skype, or even sending a text message 
if you’re really on the go! 

Health professionals assert that psychological well being is 
interconnected with physical and social health. It’s true! 
My siblings and I can almost pin point when my mother’s 
existing chronic health ailments are going to be at their 
worst: usually when there has been a prolonged gap in people 
having visited. 

As we age, our time perspective changes. I can think to 
myself ‘I just saw my mother a week ago’ but to her, that 
can seem too long. We don’t have to do all the socializing 
ourselves and it doesn’t have to be complicated. 

There are also some great community social programs 
available. Some include home visits. Sadly, they are less 
familiar to elders so time spent investigating them would be 
wise. There are services that can be purchased as well. 
These range from home care to snow removal to meal and 
cleaning services. Even if hiring a service is not entirely 
needed, you will be adding another socializing experience to 
their week. And high school students can earn their 
community service hours by visiting elders too! 

So remember, before you curl up in front of the fire with a 
cup of hot chocolate with your family tonight, think of who 
would appreciate a visit or a phone call from you the most. 
I’ll bet an elder comes to mind.

Reprinted by permission.

Pete Aarssen is a Certified Financial Planner and Elder 
Planning Counselor, currently working as a Regional Director 
with Freedom 55 Financial Division. His work as the Elder's 
Spokesman has made him an in-demand speaker on elder issues 
in Canada.

He and his wife Shelley live on a hobby farm with their four 
children outside of Sarnia, Ontario.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

HealthUSA: Emergency recall: Bad ground beef sparks recall of product in 5 states


Before a mass poisoning can take further effect, I'm grateful that the USA and Canada have emergency operations in bad food cases organized and always ready to 'roll.'

— Albert Gedraitis

Christian Science Monitor (Jan31,2k13)


Ground beef recall 

linked to illness 

in five states


Ground beef recalled last week may be responsible for symptoms experienced by 16 people in Michigan, Arizona, Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin who ate the recalled ground beef.

by Mike Stobbe, Associated Press / January 28, 2013





NEW YORK
Ground beef recalled last week is linked to 16 cases of salmonella food poisoning in five states, say federal health officials.
No one has died, but half were hospitalized. Most of the illnesses have been in Michigan, but a few cases were scattered in ArizonaIllinoisIowa and Wisconsin.
RECOMMENDED: Six major food recalls
Seven people ate a raw ground beef dish called kibbeh (kib-BEH') last month at a suburban Detroit restaurant that wasn't identified. Health officials say consumers should not eat uncooked meat.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said the cases have been linked to last week's recall of more than 1,000 pounds of ground beef from two Michigan businesses, Troy-based Gab Halal Foods and Sterling Heights-based Jouni Meats.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

World gears up to fight Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) to make the world — God's world an NTD free planet

17 culprits are busy every day and nite undermining the health of our world's — God's world's — people under the burden of sicknesses most of us can only imagine.  Oh, we may have heard the names of some of these life-takers and society-wreckers which entrench the cycle of poverty and neglect for millions of people today, but the cost of the immiseration of these people on the structures of family life and wellness are staggering beyond imagination.  A movement has been initiated and is active already since January of last year to control, eliminate, and eradicate 10 of the 17 by the year 2020.  Get more information on the London Declaration against NTDs.  Download the 1st Annual Report on the London Declaration on NTDs.  This fact-filled report that is good for use in Christian schools is available in several languages.  All the facts in this blog-entry, and most of the text, are derived / quoted from Business and Human Rights, and the unprecedented group of partners centered around the World Health Organization's leadership which has produced the download above.  Included are GlaxoSmithKline and 12 other global pharmaceutical companies along with the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other groups.   B&HR:  "The progress our coalition reports today includes that: We fully met requests for 1.12 billion treatments for NTDs29 countries began receiving drugs to treat or prevent soil-transmitted helminthes, resulting in an almost six-fold increase in treatments….There was increased funding and collaboration to improve outcomes….Two NTD diagnostic tests received regulatory approval."

Perhaps best of all:  WHO's own Executive Board which just met in Geneva, Switzerland, on January 29, 2013, has taken heart and has recommended to the full World Health Assembly to meet in Geneva in May 2013, that all 17 of the 'negelected tropical diseases' (NTDs) — beyond the current and heroics-demanding 10 — come under the mandate of 'prevent, control, eliminate, eradicate' .... 

— Albert Gedraitis

Use this code to cut-and-paste, or go to refWrite Backpage where the video will embed directly.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/952jT4GbTrQ?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


World Health Organization’s roadmap

The path to a world free of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs)

What does 'NTD-free' mean? 

WHO’s Roadmap for Implementation, put forward in January 2012, outlined bold targets for the control and elimination of 17 NTDs. In January 2013, WHO launched its second report (available at www.who.int/neglected_diseases) with updated information on the specific targets for each disease and what needs to be done to reach the 2020 goals. Below are the 10 NTDs targeted for control, elimination or eradication as part of the London Declaration on NTDs.

•  Blinding trachoma

•  Chagas disease

•  Guinea worm disease

•  Human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness)

•  Lymphatic filariasis (LF or elephantiasis)

•  Leprosy

•  Onchocerciasis (river blindness)

•  Schistosomiasis (snail fever or bilharzia)

•  Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH or intestinal worms)

•  Visceral leishmaniasis (kala azar)



Over the past year, there has been exciting progress:

•  Pharmaceutical partners supplied 1.12 billion treatments
meeting the increased requests from endemic countries.

•  Donors committed funds to support integrated NTD
programs, scale up and expand existing programs,
increase resources available for mapping, improve
program strategies through research, and develop new
tools.

•  More than 40 endemic countries developed multi-year
integrated NTD plans, and Nigeria, Brazil, Cameroon,
Honduras and Burundi launched their plans.

•  Oman became the first previously endemic country to
verify the elimination of trachoma.

•  Partners developed a comprehensive London Declaration 
Scorecard, presented in this report and online, to
promote accountability, transparency and evidence
based prioritization. This scorecard tracks the delivery
of London Declaration commitments, highlights key
milestones and targets, and helps identify priority action 
areas to ensure that 2020 goals are met.

With these new drug supplies and integrated NTD plans,
programs are ready to scale up. Building on these
promising beginnings, new partners and resources are 
urgently needed to be on track toward achieving the WHO 
goals. By redoubling our efforts, together we can empower
communities to break the cycle of poverty and neglect by 
overcoming the burden of NTDs.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

French contraceptive pill Mélanie and USA contraceptive YAZ are both manufactured by Bayer

French case of young woman who suffered stroke and coma apparently due to contraceptive Mélanie pill sold in France stirs comparisons.  In the USA, 13,500 women taking the YAZ pill have filed suits. The UN's autonomous agency, Business and Human Rights is circulating information about the case. The manufacturer in both countries is Bayer, and the French health watchdog agency, ANSM, is also in question for not stopping the drug.

— Albert Gedraitis



Radio France International Service english (Jan23,2k13) via Business & Human Rights (en français ici)

French woman sues Bayer 

over 3rd-generation contraceptive pill

Meliane pills
DR

By RFI
A French woman is suing pharmaceutical giant Bayer after suffering a stroke that she blames on a third-generation contraceptive pill. He lawyer says that a new case for involuntary homicide is in the works.

Marion Larat, 25, who has been classified as 25 per cent handicapped, has filed a case against Bayer and the French health watchdog, ANSM, after suffering a stroke and a coma in 2006. She has also suffered many after-effects, she says, including speech and memory problems.  Larat says she did not make the connection with the Méliane pill until 2010 when she changed gynaecologist.  “Nobody, but nobody, should take the third- or fourth-generation pill,” she told the AFP news agency.

At present between 1.5 million and two million women take the pills in France.

Although the ANSM has warned of possible dangers, Larat argues that it should have ordered the pill to be taken off the market.

Her lawyer, Jean-Christophe Coubris, said Friday that the parents of a young woman who was taking the pill and died from a blood clot on the lung may launch legal action against Bayer in the next few weeks.

Apart from expressing sympathy for the pain of the plaintiff, the company has refused to comment.

About 13,500 suits have been filed in the US by women who have taken Bayer’s YAZ pill.
TAGS: CONTRACEPTION - FRANCE - HEALTH - LAW - MEDICINE - UNITED STATES

Monday, January 21, 2013

Christian employers: Lined up for exploitation by the Fluck Doctrine and Obama's Affordable Care Act



The advent of an active conflict between some advocates for women's rights and some advocates for the religious rights of employers is a sign of the times.  The women's movement, if it be that, which wants to charge the public purse and tax-payers for recreational sex expenses (the Fluck Doctrine) has gone to bizarre doctrines of law.  The original movement of Second Wave Feminism (1960s to 1980s)  in North America coud in its day come up with some corkers, but these activist women weren't entirely statist-minded, as I recall.  As more and more young women joined that movement and the Third Wave formed in the 1990s continuing into the present, they had an opportunity to found trusts, endowed funds, and foundations to provide abortions to any women who after considering her options, choose to abort her unborn without coercion either way.  This woud have been a radical non-statist approach, but beyond the social imaginary of the women of those times.  The willingness to form communal associations to secure to all women and any women free access to abortion, without coercion but really free choice, just wasn't present.  Besides being the period most likely to be considered a women's day in history, it was also saddled with the ethos of the Me Generation — which meant mature communal associations coudn't evolve under women's guidance to solve the abortion issue.  Instead, in Canada with no law at all to govern the situation, the freedom to exercize her sphere sovereignty over her own body and to take responsiblity for herself, with wise financial planning ($1 a month woud have endowed such foundations massively over time), thru sisterly organization for future exigencies, but that chance was lost.  There was no sense of sisterly communal calling in that regard.  Instead, go into politics and make the state omnicompetent over women's bodies and medical doctor's procedures.

So the responsiblity passed to the state, however reluctant, but before that possibility coud be made legal and realistic, the aborters for hire appeared on the scene.  In Canada, it was the mass abortionists under the leadership of the non-woman (must I say it?), Dr Henry Morgantaler, who found a managerdial-capitalist niche for himself.  In the USA, it was the agency founded on genocide of the poor, Planned Parenthood, that came to occupy that niche most widely.  They exemplify how it was determined, the structuration of what so many women woud have to resort over the decades afterward.  This put the means of getting abortions out of the hands of the broad spectrum of women and made them captive, lacking their own network of foundation-funded clinics, to Morgantaler Abortion Clinics and Planned Parenthood's one-way "counselling."  The latter soon learned in many places to get its money from state and Federal government.  So, the Fluck logic is simply vacuum-logic from the detritus of the statist solution to everything female.

Now comes a group of Christian employers who don't want to be absorbed into this alien logic; it seems thedy don't want solutions to the problem of accessible abortion care, but they certainly can't catch up with the enormity that the Fluck Doctrine enshrined in the Affordable Health Care Act now imposes on them.  They woud like help from the courts, but it's hi-ly unlikely they will get any.

— Lawt, refWrite Frontpage juridics newspotter, analyst, columnist

Washington Post (Jan22,2k13)

Christian employers challenging contraceptive provision of health care law, reject idea of any penalties

















Joe Raedle/Getty Images -    As Supremes refuse relief to Christian employers who don't want to pay for employee's contraception under Obama's Affordable Care Act, protesters hold signs and pray during a gathering billed as the “Stand Up for Religious Freedom Rally” in MIami in June 2012.


Enjoy the festivities, President Obama, and while you’re on the grand stage Monday, it might be wise to make nice with the assembled Supreme Court justices.
The next legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act is moving quickly to the high court, and bringing potent questions about religious freedom, gender equality and corporate “personhood.”

Graphic
Challenges to ‘contraception mandate’
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story
Challenges to ‘contraception mandate’


The issue is the health-care law’s requirement that employers without a specific exemption must provide workers with insurance plans that cover a full range of birth-control measures and contraceptive drugs.
Inclusion of the no-cost contraceptive coverage for female workers has always been a controversial part of the legislation. It has now sparked more than 40 lawsuits around the nation involving more than 110 individuals, colleges, hospitals, church-affiliated nonprofits and private companies.
The cases involving those with religious affiliations are in limbo, as the Obama administration works on regulations that might provide a compromise. In a case involving two such institutions — Wheaton College in Illinois and Belmont Abbey College in North Carolina — a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is requiring administration officials to report by mid-February about the new rule, which is to be issued by spring.
At the same time, “the business cases are moving 


groups coordinating the challenges to the law. Duncan said he believes the cases will be decided in 

lower courts in plenty of time for the Supreme Court to decide whether to review the issue in its term 

that begins in October.

By Duncan’s count, there are 14 cases filed by business owners who say the law forces them to choose between running their companies and following their religious beliefs. In nine of those cases, courts have issued injunctions until the conflicts can be decided on their merits.
The cases differ by what the business owners say they are willing to provide — some say all contraceptives would violate their religious beliefs, others object only to abortifacients such as the “morning-after pill” and intrauterine devices. But all rely on protections in the First Amendment regarding free exercise of religion and in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
The 1993 act prohibits the federal government from imposing a “substantial burden” on a person’s exercise of religion unless there is a “compelling governmental interest” and the measure is the least-restrictive method of achieving the interest.
No court of appeals has reached the merits of the challenges, but two — the 7th and 8th circuits in Chicago and St. Louis respectively — have granted business owners injunctions, and two — the 6th in Cincinnati and the 10th in Denver — have denied them.
And along the way, those decisions give a pretty clear indication of the fight ahead.
The most promising for the challengers is a ruling by a three-judge panel of the 7th Circuit. Cyril and Jane Korte, owners of K & L Contractors, said the new law offends their Roman Catholic beliefs. They wanted to replace the insurance program they offered their workers, which they found provided contraceptive services, with one that did not.

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Health: Sitting can ill you: read the pattern that has become multi-national and worldwide

Think about how much of your daily time is spent sitting ... scary, huh?  Now give Kate Linau's analytic article some meditative time and journey with her into what she's learned about our major (in)activity, on our rear ends, sitting ...

-- Albert Gedraitis


Maclean's.ca (Jan20,2k13)

Sitting can ill you

It’s tied to obesity, diabetes and cancer–and exercise won’t make up for it
by Kate Lunau on Tuesday, January 8, 2013 1:36pm - 5 Comments






On Sept. 24, 2007, a Monday evening, Cathleen Renner sat down in her home office to tackle a project. Renner, 47, was a manager at AT&T, where she’d been for 25 years. It isn’t clear how many hours she spent at the computer that night, making a plan for a possible employee strike, but she did send an email to a colleague at 12:26 a.m. When her son got up at 7 a.m., she was at her desk. Renner took him to the bus a little later, and as she walked out the door, she clutched her leg and let out a cry of pain. Still, she returned to work. At 11:34, she called an ambulance. Renner was dead by the time she reached the hospital.
Like most of us, Renner spent long hours on the job seated at her computer; in a workers’ compensation claim filed after her death, her husband argued that sitting was what killed her. (Renner died of a pulmonary embolism after a blood clot formed in her leg.) The case was not exactly straightforward; AT&T called an expert who pointed out Renner was morbidly obese, weighing 304 lb., and had recently started taking new medication, birth control pills. But in 2011 a New Jersey judge ruled in James Renner’s favour, noting his wife’s job required her to “spend unusually long hours at her computer” and awarding him workers’ compensation benefits as a result. The decision was extremely unusual, the first of its kind legal observers could recall. But if a growing number of health experts are right about the dangers of sitting, it could be a harbinger of things to come.
Like obesity or smoking before it, sitting is the new plague, and not just because it can lead to deadly blood clots. Alarmingly, the latest research links it to obesity, diabetes and the major killers, heart disease and cancer. And exercising the recommended half-hour a day, while beneficial, isn’t enough to stave off the ill effects of sitting. “Thirty minutes is two per cent of your day,” says Mark Tremblay, director of the Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (HALO) at the CHEO Research Institute in Ottawa. “What about the other 98 per cent?”

Read more ...