I coudn't believe the crassness of the Mayor of New York City when questioned about new restrictions on the prescriptons of painkiller drugs by doctors. First, he uses "death" as an example of suffering, but it isn't — not if you have painkiller prescription drugs up to and thru the moment of death. After death, the body does not suffer, it dissolves. So, why is the Mayor mixing apples and oranges? Suffering of the body is not his to dish out, not his to encourage. Only a sadist thinks that way. Those in pain shoud not play masochist to his sadism.
Of course, I do realize that holdups of people coming out of pharmacies is a distinct problem in New York City, but in certain neiborhoods and not across the whole of Gotham. The mayor'ss solution is no solution for those of us who don't have his kind of wealth. He never has to go see a doctor or a pharmacy, in the first place, he can easily pay to have them come to him; or if he has to go to a pharmacy, he can take an armed guard or a squadron with him. We can't. So when he says that we can "suffer a bit," we must let him that we know that his plan to use us in that way is not acceptable. He has to be fair to everybody, and he isn't succeeding with these S&M routines he's subscribing to the citizens in pain.
— Albert Gedraitis
Observer.com Politicker London UK (Jan12,2k13)
Bloomberg slaps down criticism of Painkiller Restriction Plan
Yesterday, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and city officials unveiled a new initiative to
limit supplies of prescription painkillers in the
city’s emergency rooms as a way to combat what they described as a
growing addiction problem in the region. Some critics, as documented by
The New York Times, however, felt the move would
unnecessarily hurt poor and uninsured patients who
use emergency rooms as their primary care doctor. Needless to say, Mr. Bloomberg was not swayed by this line of argument.
“The city hospitals we control, so … we’re going to do it and we’re urging all of the other hospitals to do it, voluntary guidelines. Somebody said, oh, somebody wrote, ‘Oh then maybe there won’t be enough painkillers for the poor who use the emergency rooms as their primary care doctor,’” the mayor said on his weekly radio show with John Gambling. “Number one, there’s no evidence of that. Number two, supposing it is really true, so you didn’t get enough painkillers and you did have to suffer a little bit. The other side of the coin is people are dying and there’s nothing perfect … There’s nothing that you can possibly do where somebody isn’t going to suffer, and it’s always the same group [claiming], ‘Everybody is heartless.’ Come on, this is a very big problem.”
In the same interview, Mr. Bloomberg stressed the initiative’s simple rationale is to prevent extra pills from piling up in the cabinets of New Yorkers who no longer need them, where they can pose a health risk if they’re abused.
“We talk about drugs, heroin and crack and marijuana, this is one of the big outbursts–and it’s a lot worse around the country than it is here. It’s kids and adults getting painkillers and using them for entertainment purposes, or whatever field of purposes, as opposed to what they are designed for,” he explained. “If you break a leg, you’re going to be in pain, nothing wrong with getting something that reduces the pain. But if you get 20 days worth of pills and you only need them three days, there’s 17 days sitting there. Invariably some of the kids are going to find them, or you’re going to take them and get you addicted.”
Mr. Bloomberg also argued the number of pain pills currently being prescribed had even contributed to an uptick in violent crimes outside of pharmacies from robbers looking to steal the drugs.
“You see there’s a lot more hold-ups of pharmacies, people getting held up as they walk out of pharmacies,” he explained. “What are they all about? They’re not trying to steal your shaving cream or toothpaste at the point of a gun. They want these drugs.”
